Ut enim ad minim. facilisis suspendisseipsum dolor sit amet dolore consectetur adipisicing elit sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et magna aliqua enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud.
Zirconia and ceramics are both common dental restoration materials, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The choice depends on the specific needs of the patient. Here is a comparison between the two:
Strength and durability
Zirconia: high strength, good fracture resistance, suitable for posterior tooth restoration and areas with high bite force, long service life.
Ceramics: low strength, easy to break, suitable for anterior tooth restoration, good aesthetics.
Aesthetics
Zirconia: poor aesthetics in the early days, modern technology has improved its transparency, close to natural teeth.
Ceramic: excellent aesthetics, high transparency, suitable for anterior tooth restoration.
Biocompatibility
Zirconia: good biocompatibility, not easy to cause allergies or rejection.
Ceramic: good biocompatibility, suitable for most patients.
Grinding amount
Zirconia: high strength, less grinding amount required.
Ceramic: more grinding is required to ensure strength and beauty.
Price
Zirconia: higher price, but strong durability.
Ceramics: Relatively low price, but may need to be replaced more frequently.
Scope of application
Zirconia: Suitable for posterior tooth restorations, full crowns and bridges.
Ceramics: Suitable for anterior veneers, inlays and restorations with high aesthetic requirements.
Summary
Zirconia: High strength and durability, suitable for posterior teeth and areas with high bite forces.
Ceramics: Good aesthetics, suitable for anterior tooth restorations.